[c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

Ge Moua moua0100 at umn.edu
Tue Nov 17 16:16:50 EST 2009


we've got some p2p routed ports over here

!
interface Port-channel1
 description [removed]
 mtu 4470
 ip address 192.168.11.105 255.255.255.252
 no negotiation auto
 snmp trap link-status
 hold-queue 150 in
!


Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0100 at umn.edu

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services



Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what are the port-channel on the 7200/7600 is used for?
> Is it a point to point routed port, or with L2 VLANs switched on top of it?
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of luismi
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 19:11
> To: Gert Doering
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?
>
> I was just curious, because I would like to deploy BFD but I saw those
> messages on my routers because the port-channels configurations and I
> would like to know if it was supported in other train or something
> similar.
>
> El mar, 17-11-2009 a las 15:12 +0100, Gert Doering escribió:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:20:58PM +0100, luismi wrote:
>>     
>>> I wrote it in a previous email but here is again :D
>>>
>>> 7200 npe-g2 and 7600 rsp720-pfc3
>>>       
>> These are very very *VERY* different platforms...
>>
>>     
>>> I am using 12.2SRC but it is not supported there an I would like to know
>>> if it is supported in another train.
>>>       
>> ... so it might very well be supported on one of them, and not on the
>> other...
>>
>> Just for the record - my assumption was wrong.  I just tried to configure
>> BFD on a 6500 with SXF and SXH3a, and neither even permits me to enter
>> the bfd commands on the port-channel interfaces.  Physical interfaces 
>> only.
>>
>> (Which makes some sort of sense, *iff* the BFD-handling is done in the 
>> line card - where it belongs, to be independent of whatever load the 
>> main CPU is having.  OTOH, I don't think normal 6500 LAN cards are smart
>> enough to run BFD locally.  So whatever...)
>>
>> gert
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>   


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list