[c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?
Ge Moua
moua0100 at umn.edu
Tue Nov 17 16:16:50 EST 2009
we've got some p2p routed ports over here
!
interface Port-channel1
description [removed]
mtu 4470
ip address 192.168.11.105 255.255.255.252
no negotiation auto
snmp trap link-status
hold-queue 150 in
!
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0100 at umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services
Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what are the port-channel on the 7200/7600 is used for?
> Is it a point to point routed port, or with L2 VLANs switched on top of it?
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of luismi
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 19:11
> To: Gert Doering
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?
>
> I was just curious, because I would like to deploy BFD but I saw those
> messages on my routers because the port-channels configurations and I
> would like to know if it was supported in other train or something
> similar.
>
> El mar, 17-11-2009 a las 15:12 +0100, Gert Doering escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:20:58PM +0100, luismi wrote:
>>
>>> I wrote it in a previous email but here is again :D
>>>
>>> 7200 npe-g2 and 7600 rsp720-pfc3
>>>
>> These are very very *VERY* different platforms...
>>
>>
>>> I am using 12.2SRC but it is not supported there an I would like to know
>>> if it is supported in another train.
>>>
>> ... so it might very well be supported on one of them, and not on the
>> other...
>>
>> Just for the record - my assumption was wrong. I just tried to configure
>> BFD on a 6500 with SXF and SXH3a, and neither even permits me to enter
>> the bfd commands on the port-channel interfaces. Physical interfaces
>> only.
>>
>> (Which makes some sort of sense, *iff* the BFD-handling is done in the
>> line card - where it belongs, to be independent of whatever load the
>> main CPU is having. OTOH, I don't think normal 6500 LAN cards are smart
>> enough to run BFD locally. So whatever...)
>>
>> gert
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list