[c-nsp] BDF over port-channels?

luismi asturluismi at gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 05:24:03 EST 2009


That is what I was looking for.
do you use it in 7600 and/or 7200?

El mar, 17-11-2009 a las 22:16 +0000, Abidin Kahraman escribió:
> BFD over port-channel is supported on SRD1.
> 
> HTH
> Abidin
> 
> On 17 Nov 2009, at 17:35, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> 
> > According to Cisco:
> > 
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute/configuration/guide/irp_bfd.html#wp1054055
> > 
> > ============================================================
> > For the following Cisco IOS Releases, BFD on PortChannel is not a supported configuration: 12.2SXF, 12.2SRC, and 12.2SRB.
> > ============================================================
> > 
> > Also there is CSCek67622:
> > ============================================================
> > BFD should not be configurable on etherchannel intf
> > Symptoms: The bfd interval command is accepted on
> > EtherChannel and EtherChannel member interfaces.
> > 
> > Conditions: This symptom is observed on a Cisco router while BFD is not
> > supported on EtherChannels.
> > 
> > Workaround: Do not enter the bfd interval command on
> > EtherChannel and EtherChannel member interfaces.
> > ============================================================
> > 
> > It's still not clear whether it's supported on SRD (and ES cards) or will be supported in the future...
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Tassos
> > 
> > luismi wrote on 17/11/2009 14:20:
> >> I wrote it in a previous email but here is again :D
> >> 7200 npe-g2 and 7600 rsp720-pfc3
> >> I am using 12.2SRC but it is not supported there an I would like to know
> >> if it is supported in another train.
> >> El mar, 17-11-2009 a las 11:09 +0100, Gert Doering escribió:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:01:48AM +0100, luismi wrote:
> >>>> I see a message like "BDF not supported over port-channels" in my
> >>>> routers.
> >>> Which IOS version is that?  On what platform?
> >>> 
> >>> You could be a bit more proactive in your questions... this makes it
> >>> much easier to give meaningful responses, really... :-)
> >>> 
> >>> gert
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> > -- 
> > Tassos
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list