[c-nsp] SUP720 - 12.2(18)SXF17
Ross Vandegrift
ross at kallisti.us
Fri Oct 9 11:42:18 EDT 2009
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> But I agree, we set 100/10 for RPF/TTL/UNREACH-no-route/MTU failure, and
> I'm glad of it, because it's saved us from a couple of nasties.
How are folks arriving at the 100/10 setting? Our boxes are using
500/100, but hell if I remember how we came up with those numbers.
Interesting to notice that you guys have them turned down quite a bit
more than we do.
--
Ross Vandegrift
ross at kallisti.us
"If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough,
the songs get tougher."
--Woody Guthrie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20091009/07d4e77f/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list