[c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface

[Randy McAnally]

6500 platform.

Last time we had 'mls qos' enabled we had massive speed/packet loss issues
with interfaces over 40% utilization since we don't classify traffic.

Is there any possible issues you might see?

--
Randy

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Ian MacKinnon <Ian.Mackinnon at lumison.net>
To: Randy McAnally <rsm at fast-serv.com>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:44:57 +0100
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface

> Hi Randy,
> What platform?
> On 6500/7600 the answer is yes, you need mls qos vlan-based on the 
> physical interfaces and then you can police on the SVI.
> 
> Ian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Randy McAnally Sent: 08 
> September 2009 11:40 To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] 
> service-policy on virtual interface
> 
> Do the same commands work e.g. 'service-policy input/output 
> FooPolicy' at the virtual interface level the same as they do on a 
> physical port, both in and out?
> 
> I'm trying to set up rate limiting 'further up the line' rather than 
> at the network edge, so we can pool customer bandwidth and keep 
> inbound floods of traffic from being passed beyond the distribution layer.
> 
> --
> Randy
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> 
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date: 
> 09/07/09 18:03:00
> 
> --
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. 
> Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
> Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or 
> opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
> do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the 
> recipient should check this email and any attachments for the 
> presence of viruses.  Lumison accept no liability for any damage 
> caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
------- End of Original Message -------