[c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface

[Randy McAnally]

Thanks, I don't want to enable global QOS (queuing) which 'mls qos' will
enable.  The default queues cause all kinds of trouble with our traffic (you
can see details in another topic I created couple months back).

--
Randy
www.FastServ.com

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Randy McAnally" <rsm at fast-serv.com>
To: Ian MacKinnon <Ian.Mackinnon at lumison.net>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 07:13:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface

> By 'not classify' I meant all of our traffic is in the same default 
> class. Could you verify that 'mls qos' is not needed globally before 
> you can do 'mls qos vlan-based' on an interface?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> Randy
> 
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Ian MacKinnon <Ian.Mackinnon at lumison.net>
> To: Randy McAnally <rsm at fast-serv.com>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
> <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:05:57 +0100
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface
> 
> > Not seen problems turning on mls qos.
> > We have on the physicals :-
> > Int gi1/1
> > mls qos vlan-based
> > mls qos trust dscp
> > and a typical service policy looks like :-
> > policy-map 10MegPolice
> >   class class-default
> >    police 10000000 26000 32000    conform-action transmit     exceed-
> > action transmit     violate-action drop
> > 
> > what do you mean you don't classify?
> > 
> > Ian
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randy McAnally [mailto:rsm at fast-serv.com]
> > Sent: 08 September 2009 11:54
> > To: Ian MacKinnon; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface
> > 
> > 6500 platform.
> > 
> > Last time we had 'mls qos' enabled we had massive speed/packet loss issues
> > with interfaces over 40% utilization since we don't classify traffic.
> > 
> > Is there any possible issues you might see?
> > 
> > --
> > Randy
> > 
> > ---------- Original Message -----------
> > From: Ian MacKinnon <Ian.Mackinnon at lumison.net>
> > To: Randy McAnally <rsm at fast-serv.com>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
> > <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:44:57 +0100
> > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface
> > 
> > > Hi Randy,
> > > What platform?
> > > On 6500/7600 the answer is yes, you need mls qos vlan-based on the
> > > physical interfaces and then you can police on the SVI.
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > > bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Randy McAnally Sent: 08
> > > September 2009 11:40 To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp]
> > > service-policy on virtual interface
> > >
> > > Do the same commands work e.g. 'service-policy input/output
> > > FooPolicy' at the virtual interface level the same as they do on a
> > > physical port, both in and out?
> > >
> > > I'm trying to set up rate limiting 'further up the line' rather than
> > > at the network edge, so we can pool customer bandwidth and keep
> > > inbound floods of traffic from being passed beyond the distribution layer.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Randy
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > >
> > > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date:
> > > 09/07/09 18:03:00
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> > > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> > > If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
> > > Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
> > > Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or
> > > opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
> > > do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the
> > > recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
> > > presence of viruses.  Lumison accept no liability for any damage
> > > caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
> > ------- End of Original Message -------
> > 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > 
> > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date: 
> > 09/07/09 18:03:00
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> > If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. 
> > Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
> > Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or 
> > opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
> > do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the 
> > recipient should check this email and any attachments for the 
> > presence of viruses.  Lumison accept no liability for any damage 
> > caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
> ------- End of Original Message -------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------- End of Original Message -------