[c-nsp] cisco 7206 VXR router
Scott Granados
gsgranados at comcast.net
Tue Sep 29 16:09:07 EDT 2009
You're right, I was trying to express that the interfaces were able to out
perform / to fast for the processor. I.E. the 2621 example someone listed
earlier.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Hennigan" <jay at west.net>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7206 VXR router
> Scott Granados wrote:
>
>> Better worded, a common issue with vendor C is that they have processors
>> that the interfaces can't keep up with. Other vendors including one that
>> starts with a J have fewer issues in this area.;)
>
> I think you have it bass-ackwards. There are interfaces that the
> processors can't keep up with.
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net
> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list