[c-nsp] cisco 7206 VXR router

Scott Granados gsgranados at comcast.net
Tue Sep 29 16:09:07 EDT 2009


You're right, I was trying to express that the interfaces were able to out 
perform / to fast for the processor.  I.E. the 2621 example someone listed 
earlier.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Hennigan" <jay at west.net>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7206 VXR router


> Scott Granados wrote:
>
>> Better worded, a common issue with vendor C is that they have processors 
>> that the interfaces can't keep up with.  Other vendors including one that 
>> starts with a J have fewer issues in this area.;)
>
> I think you have it bass-ackwards.  There are interfaces that the 
> processors can't keep up with.
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net
> Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list