[c-nsp] portchannel load balancing between L3 switch and router
Pavel Dimow
paveldimow at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 11:32:24 EDT 2010
The problem is that between ASR and 7600 is SCE, and as I don't have
enough experience
with it, the per flow load balancing can be a problem as I have found that SCE
requires incoming and outgoing packets to use the same port, or I am
missing something?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avayner at cisco.com> wrote:
> Elmar,
>
> Please check this link:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ios_xe/lanswitch/configuration/guide
> /lsw_cfg_flwload_xe_ps9587_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
>
> You should be looking at the "Flow Based" option...
>
> Per the command reference
> (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/interface/command/reference/ir_l1.h
> tml#wp1022040) This is available since IOS XE 2.5
>
> Arie
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Elmar K. Bins
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 17:13
> To: Pavel Dimow
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] portchannel load balancing between L3 switch and
> router
>
> Re Pavel,
>
> paveldimow at gmail.com (Pavel Dimow) wrote:
>
>> port-channel load-balancing vlan-manual
>>
>> and I understand that I can't have one vlan loadbalanced across two
>> portchannel members but
>> only the one at the time and second member is standby.
>>
>> Am I right or there is another solution?
>
> I have tried the same thing (trunk-channeling), and it just does not
> work on ASRs (yet?).
>
> So yes, you are right, there seems to be no other solution right now.
> Maybe someone from Cisco can tell us whether this issue will be
> remedied.
>
> Yours,
> Elmar.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list