[c-nsp] 3750X?

Rubens Kuhl rubensk at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 20:59:23 EDT 2010


I couldn't find the maximum routes when one uses the IPv4+IPv6
template, is it the same of 3750, as the IPv4 only number seems to be
?

Rubens


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Siva Valliappan <svalliap at cisco.com> wrote:
> the X-models are at a lower list price then the E-models.
>
> thanks
> .siva
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 08:57 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>>
>>> So, before the meeting, does anyone else have opinions or questions
>>> that I should be asking?
>>
>> Ask them when they will begin supporting software upgrades per-member in
>> a stack. :-)
>>
>> The power sharing looks impressive. And it supports MACsec, though
>> that's probably hardly relevant yet. Together with PoE+ those are the
>> things that make it stand out from the 3750E in my eyes.
>>
>> Are these X-models considerably more expensive than E-models? Or are
>> they targeted at replacing the E-models?
>>
>> --
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list