[c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded
eNinja
eninja at gmail.com
Wed Apr 28 09:53:58 EDT 2010
Mike,
This is a PMPE and as such, the tracebacks et al are invalid and so
too the decodes.
There is _no_ software fix to prevent PMPEs.
Most PMPEs are caused by cosmic radiation and sometimes (albeit
rarely) from built up ESD due to improper personnel handling of
components. Since lightning doesn't strike the same spot twice,
chances are there won't be a recurrence on the same processor.
Monitor and replace the NPE with mem if this recurs within the next 6
months otherwise it was a transient issue and no further action is
required.
ITMT, ensure safe ESD compliance when handling components.
Eninja
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Mike <mike-
cisconsplist at tiedyenetworks.com> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Well that was fun, I discovered that my trusty 7204vxr reloaded
> unexpectedly and I find myself without a good explanation. Show
> version gives me 'processor memory pairity error':
>
> System returned to ROM by processor memory parity error at PC
> 0x60640F70, address 0x0 at 03:09:00 PST Tue Apr 27 2010
> System restarted at 04:10:28 PDT Tue Apr 27 2010
> System image file is "disk0:c7200-is-mz.123-26.bin"
>
> and digging thru the 'show tech' gave me:
>
> Pid 3: Process "OSPF Hello" stack 0x63D733F0 savedsp 0x63D75660
> Flags: analyze on_old_queue
> Status 0x00000000 Orig_ra 0x00000000 Routine 0x00000000
> Signal 0
> Caller_pc 0x60CDAE84 Callee_pc 0x60806190 Dbg_events 0x00000000
> State 1
> Totmalloc 548640 Totfree 441612 Totgetbuf 15876
> Totretbuf 0 Edisms 0x60CD71A4 Eparm 0x64A91E7C
> Elapsed 0xC6E634 Ncalls 0xE09B9AA Ngiveups 0x491E
> Priority_q 3 Ticks_5s 2 Cpu_5sec 81
> Cpu_1min 40
> Cpu_5min 8 Stacksize 0x2328 Lowstack 0x2328
> Ttyptr 0x63D55FA8 Mem_holding 0x0 Thrash_count 0
> Wakeup_reasons 0x0FFFFFFF Default_wakeup_reasons 0x0FFFFFFF
> Direct_wakeup_major 0x00000000 Direct_wakeup_minor 0x00000000
>
>
> So my inexperienced glancing would say it was something to do with
> OSPF. My question tho is, #1, how do I really debug a problem like
> this, and #2, what would the minimum cisco contract be required to
> make sure I have access to the cco/bug advisor and possibly updated
> IOS for this device? Its been a tank with absolutely zero issues in
> this enviorment for more than a year, but this event underscores the
> fact that we have no real support route and probabbly should get on
> some program even for our little operation.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mike-
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list