[c-nsp] Nexus 5xxx VPC peer keepalives
Ryan West
rwest at zyedge.com
Wed Apr 28 14:10:51 EDT 2010
Charles,
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:36 PM
> To: nsp-cisco
> Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5xxx VPC peer keepalives
>
> Anyone,
>
> Coming up on a design issue with our upcoming first deployment of Nexus
> 5010s and 5020s in a new datacenter. It's recommended in the following doc
> to use the mgmt0 interface for peer keepalive messages:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/layer2/Cisco_
> Nexus_5000_Series_NX-
> OS__chapter8.html#concept_47F7274E5FDA489884D0488BC491B066
>
> We're doing a true out of band management approach on this new network, so the
> mgmt0 interfaces all home back to an OOB switch/router (4507) which houses
> the NMS gear, etc. My concern is that a reload (or failure of some type) on
> this OOB switch could cause a 'dual active' situation on all the Nexus pairs
> of devices . (6 pairs of 5010s, and the pair of 5020s that aggregate the 5010
> pairs). I don't think I want that to happen. So the alternative seems to be
> a back to back non-VPC-peer link between the two devices using a VLAN
> interface, but I hate the idea of using a 10 gig port just for keepalives.
> There are what appears to be additional copper mgmt ports on the boxes, but
> they're covered up, and not in the CLI. Any way to utilize those? Any other
> possibilities I'm overlooking? Or am I stuck getting 1 gig copper SFPs and
> crossover cables for keepalives?
>
If the peer-link is lost, the secondary vPC shuts its ports down. If the peer-keepalive link is lost, the vPC remains up as all the traffic is still passing through the vPC peer link. I didn't find any great documentation that states that, but I forced management down through 4507R port as well and it's still up.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/C07-572835-00_NX-OS_vPC_DG.pdf
You'll only end up with a dual-active if both the peer-link and peer-keepalive link are disconnected. Cisco claims the worst that will happen is duplicate frames.
show vpc
Legend:
(*) - local vPC is down, forwarding via vPC peer-link
vPC domain id : 100
Peer status : peer adjacency formed ok
vPC keep-alive status : peer is not alive
Configuration consistency status: success
vPC role : primary
vPC Peer-link status
---------------------------------------------------------------------
id Port Status Active vlans
-- ---- ------ --------------------------------------------------
1 Po20 up 1,400
vPC status
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
id Port Status Consistency Reason Active vlans
------ ----------- ------ ----------- -------------------------- -----------
1 Po1 up success success 400
show port-channel summary
Flags: D - Down P - Up in port-channel (members)
I - Individual H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
s - Suspended r - Module-removed
S - Switched R - Routed
U - Up (port-channel)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group Port- Type Protocol Member Ports
Channel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Po1(SU) Eth LACP Eth1/1(P) Eth1/2(P) Eth1/3(P)
Eth1/4(P)
And the other end of a vPC port channel:
21 Po21(SU) LACP Gi1/0/21(P) Gi1/0/22(P) Gi1/0/23(P)
Gi1/0/24(P) Gi2/0/21(P) Gi2/0/22(P)
Gi2/0/23(P) Gi2/0/24(P)
So, it's still replicating the LACP ID properly.
Channel group 21 neighbors
Partner's information:
LACP port Oper Port Port
Port Flags Priority Dev ID Age Key Number State
Gi1/0/21 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 15s 0x8001 0x4101 0x3D
Gi1/0/22 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 0s 0x8001 0x101 0x3D
Gi1/0/23 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 15s 0x8001 0x4103 0x3D
Gi1/0/24 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 20s 0x8001 0x103 0x3D
Gi2/0/21 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 0s 0x8001 0x102 0x3D
Gi2/0/22 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 15s 0x8001 0x4102 0x3D
Gi2/0/23 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 20s 0x8001 0x104 0x3D
Gi2/0/24 SA 32768 0023.04ee.be64 15s 0x8001 0x4104 0x3D
And after brining the peer keepalive back online:
show vpc
Legend:
(*) - local vPC is down, forwarding via vPC peer-link
vPC domain id : 100
Peer status : peer adjacency formed ok
vPC keep-alive status : peer is alive
HTH,
-ryan
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list