[c-nsp] LAM / Mobile IP in modern times
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Tue Aug 10 03:43:48 EDT 2010
Had the idea of testing LAM to support an application without resorting to
inter-datacenter bridging(*) (Vmotion in this case) ,
Astonished to find the documentation old and out of date, coupled with a
lack of vrf support (no "redistribute mobile" in the VRF BGP context) ,
Can't seem to find anything suggesting a feature which could quite easily be
a superb alternative to bridging is even remotely vrf aware.
Any advice/pointers appreciated.
*
http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/cisco_and_vmware_validated_archit
ecture_for_long_distance_vmotion/
This is a terrible thing IMHO as you are still left to pick up the pieces as
to who owns the subnet for routing purposes, I personally think LAM and
sufficiently convergence tuned network should be almost if not as good.
--
David Freedman
Claranet
http://www.clara.net
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list