[c-nsp] RIP SOO not working

selamat pagi ketimun at gmail.com
Thu Aug 12 05:45:56 EDT 2010


My understanding of SOO was that if a vrf-if of a PE is configured with SOO
and a route with the same SOO-value is received, this received route will
not be placed into the vrf RIB.
Is this not correct ?

The issue is that a route propagated by CE10(10.10.10.10)  is seen in CE11
even though on both PEs an identical SSO-sitemap is configured.


Topology:
CE10 - (RIP) - PE1  - (MPLS)  - PE 10 - (RIP) CE11

PE1
interface Ethernet4/0
ip vrf forwarding XYZ
ip vrf sitemap RMSOO
ip address 2.12.1.2 255.255.255.0

route-map RMSOO permit 10
set extcommunity soo 99:99


PE10
interface Ethernet2/0
ip vrf forwarding A
ip vrf sitemap RMSOO
ip address 1.106.1.6 255.255.255.0

route-map RMSOO permit 10
set extcommunity soo 99:99



PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.10.10.10       *  --> this route should not be
seen in CE11*
BGP routing table entry for 1:1:10.10.10.10/32, version 21
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table A)
 Advertised to update-groups:
    1
 Local
   2.12.1.10 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.2)
     Origin incomplete, metric 1, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid,
sourced, best
     Extended Community: *SoO:99:99* RT:1:10,
     mpls labels in/out 206/nolabel


PE10#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.10.10.10
BGP routing table entry for 1:1:10.10.10.10/32, version 19
Paths: (1 available, best #1, no table)
 Not advertised to any peer
 Local
   10.10.10.2 (metric 20) from 10.10.10.2 (10.10.10.2)
     Origin incomplete, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
     Extended Community: SoO:99:99 RT:1:10,
     mpls labels in/out nolabel/206
BGP routing table entry for 1:6:10.10.10.10/32, version 21
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table A)
 Not advertised to any peer
 Local, imported path from 1:1:10.10.10.10/32
   10.10.10.2 (metric 20) from 10.10.10.2 (10.10.10.2)
     Origin incomplete, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
     Extended Community:* SoO:99:99* RT:1:10,
     mpls labels in/out nolabel/206



PE10#sh ip route vrf A
!snip
  C       1.106.1.0 is directly connected, Ethernet2/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B       2.12.1.0 [200/0] via 10.10.10.2, 00:36:26
     10.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
B       10.10.10.10 [200/1] via 10.10.10.2, 00:36:26
R       10.10.10.11 [120/1] via 1.106.1.10, 00:00:00, Ethernet2/0


CE11#sh ip rout
!snip
R       10.10.10.10 [120/3] via 1.106.1.6, 00:00:05, Ethernet2/0
C       10.10.10.11 is directly connected, Loopback0


Thanks, keti


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list