[c-nsp] BGP KEEPALIVE maximum frequency

M. V. bored_to_death85 at yahoo.com
Sun Dec 5 03:41:21 EST 2010


hi Pete! hi Keegan!

> I see that you're "bored to death", 

yeah, i see your point! :)

> but is it really essential to be the RFC police on an operations list?
> is it breaking anything for you?

i'm completely with you bro. but the thing is, i'm doing a research/survey on 
"RFC Conformance" of different routers (like Cisco, ...) for different dynamic 
routing protocols (BGP, OSPF, RIP, ...). i've got the results of conformance 
tests of Cisco (and some other routers) with Spirent and now i'm trying to 
analyze the result (and find the reasons of various FAILs and explain the 
incompatibilities) and see through it .
it's part of my job and i'm getting paid for it. i know these things are not 
important at all, but apparently some people don't! 'cause i know some offices 
that need "Conformance Certificate" for a router in order to buy and use it!!!). 


i didn't find any good mailing-list about cisco other than this, to answer these 
types of questions (maybe you know one?).

sorry to bother you all, but the payment is good :)

Regards.


      


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list