[c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1 in a DS-3

Frank Bulk - iName.com frnkblk at iname.com
Sun Dec 12 01:30:24 EST 2010


M(L)PPP is not an option....

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksmith at adhost.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 4:27 PM
To: frnkblk at iname.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1
in a DS-3

What's the encapsulation protocol of the T-1's?  I would think you could do
MPPP and put both T-1's into the same bridge group as the Ethernet
interface, but I'm not sure how that would work if it was using HDLC.

Mike

--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith at adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3  08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1
in a
> DS-3
> 
> Is it possible to use a Cisco 7206VXR to bridge 802.1q tagged Ethernet
> traffic to multiple T-1s within a DS-3?  The remote end, a RNC, can
> apparently take tagged traffic over multiple T-1's.
> 
> We might be willing to live with the restriction of assigning certain
T-1's
> within the DS-3 to a certain 802.1q, but would like to take advantage of
> aggregation.
> 
> Apparently we can't use PVCs, otherwise I would prefer that approach.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list