[c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1 in a DS-3
Frank Bulk - iName.com
frnkblk at iname.com
Sun Dec 12 01:30:24 EST 2010
M(L)PPP is not an option....
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksmith at adhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 4:27 PM
To: frnkblk at iname.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1
in a DS-3
What's the encapsulation protocol of the T-1's? I would think you could do
MPPP and put both T-1's into the same bridge group as the Ethernet
interface, but I'm not sure how that would work if it was using HDLC.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith at adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1
in a
> DS-3
>
> Is it possible to use a Cisco 7206VXR to bridge 802.1q tagged Ethernet
> traffic to multiple T-1s within a DS-3? The remote end, a RNC, can
> apparently take tagged traffic over multiple T-1's.
>
> We might be willing to live with the restriction of assigning certain
T-1's
> within the DS-3 to a certain 802.1q, but would like to take advantage of
> aggregation.
>
> Apparently we can't use PVCs, otherwise I would prefer that approach.
>
> Frank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list