[c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

[Sven 'Darkman' Michels]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Andy B. schrieb:
> I have other cores that do 40 times more BGP and they work like charm,
> with the exception that they do not have a few thousand servers
> connected to them. Only customers with routers.
> These routers are similar to this 6509, so nothing better or worse.

How about splitting the servers into different vlans? should lower the
broadcasts etc and may help... (its hard for me to belive that you have
one /19 or similar configured to one vlan, i hope there are a few subnets ;)

Regards,
Sven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAktxcr8ACgkQQoCguWUBzBxNJACgoic90h9xxDA8VASDwyJ4OmP4
QMwAoIz/VigSz2nch4cRZXDcVZ1jaViC
=LtsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----