[c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

Tony Varriale tvarriale at comcast.net
Fri Feb 12 00:47:59 EST 2010

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy B." <globichen at gmail.com>
To: "Lukasz Bromirski" <lukasz at bromirski.net>
Cc: "nsp-cisco" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

> I have two 6704s, te8/1-4 and te9/1-4. Some OSPFs are on one card,
> some on the others. The busy VLAN with a few thousand servers is also
> channeled on both cards. Would it be better to regroup the vlan to
> let's say te8/1-4 and everything that is backbone related (OSPF/IBGP)
> to te9/1-4. I am not sure if I am hitting any fabric limitations.
> I really do not know where else to look at...
> Andy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale at comcast.net>
To: "nsp-cisco" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router

> show ip traffic?  Anything incrementing in there by a significant amount?
> How fast do your drops/flushes increment?
> I assume these are 6704s without DFCs?  If not, what are those ports?
> tv


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list