[c-nsp] ISSU on SXF -> SXI
Rob Shakir
rjs at eng.gxn.net
Fri Feb 12 09:47:58 EST 2010
On 12 Feb 2010, at 12:29, Phil Mayers wrote:
> * The old and new image are not ISSU-compatible (different major releases or feature sets) - in which case an RPR upgrade is the best you can do.
>
> * The old and new images are ISSU compatible, and the linecard software has not changed. In this case, the linecards do not need to be restarted, and downtimes of 0-3 seconds can be achieved because it's basically just an SSO switchover.
>
> * The old and new images are ISSU compatible but the linecard software is different, so the linecards need to be restarted into the new image - this can be a faster, warm boot (if the linecard has enough RAM) or a slower, cold boot (if not)
>
> I think that's about right?
This seems quite accurate to me.
Our experience of ISSU has been terrible. We've found multiple bugs related to it, and have found that -- in general -- we're much better off in terms of service disruption with a "classic" upgrade (upgrade secondary, reload peer, force failover, etc).
Cisco advised us that it is unlikely that ISSU on 7600/6500 will meet our requirements, and hence we are better off doing classic upgrades. We've taken their advice, and will not be trying it again. I think it's suited for deployments where you have 30+ boxes that are identical in terms of configuration, and hardware, but in the SP environment (like us), the variance of boxes means that it's just not worthwhile.
Kind regards,
Rob
--
Rob Shakir <rjs at eng.gxn.net>
Network Development Engineer GX Networks/Vialtus Solutions
ddi: +44208 587 6077 mob: +44797 155 4098
pgp: 0xc07e6deb nic-hdl: RJS-RIPE
This email is subject to: http://www.vialtus.com/disclaimer.html
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list