[c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Feb 24 02:29:54 EST 2010


On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:42:17AM +0100, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:41:18 +0100, you wrote:
> > I have no idea how to get that point (BFD is good! make it happen!
> > on SVI!) across to the relevant people... *sigh*
> The SP people do get it, and I'm sure it's now (again) roadmapped for
> the 7600, where it's relevant. Whether it'll ever show up on a campus
> switch (6500) may be another story.

Now that you mention it.  I did not rant over the BU split for at least
two months, did I?

The decision for which (mid-to-high end platforms) a certain feature is 
"relevant" is something I find highly interesting.  As if enterprise 
customers don't want high availability.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100224/ba171b99/attachment.bin>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list