[c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

[Daniska, Tomas]

The only chassis-related RMA I have experienced were

1) several times the chassis came damaged due to transport

2) a failed env-mon PCB on a 7500 lots of years ago. The folk from TAC
has sent me a new chassis only to replace the tiny PCB and send the
chassis back :)

--

deejay


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dirk-Jan van Helmond
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:53 PM
> To: <NMaio at guesswho.com>
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate
> 
> Once, a 6500.
> 
> We had an environment with 8x 6500, this was a new one. When we
brought
> it into service we had very strange behavior. Dropping OSPF sessions,
> packet-loss, etc.
> We swapped everything (sup, linecards, even PSUs) before the chassis
> backplane became a suspect. The new chassis solved all problems.
> 
> 
> rgds,
> Dirk
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:34 PM, <NMaio at guesswho.com> <NMaio at guesswho.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Just a quick consensus.
> >
> > Have many people experienced chassis/backplane failure in the
> 45xx/65xx/76xx lines?  I have not yet (knock on wood) and I would just
> like to know if people have experienced this and how often.  I have
> read a few posts where this has happened.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/