[c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?

[David Freedman]

Christian MacNevin wrote:
> Standard schmandard. What's needed is a business case. 
> 
> I've got a fiver. Who wants it? TDPv2 anyone?
> 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-ldp-ipv6-03

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-rsvpte-ipv6-00

Dave.


> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:47 PM
> To: Christian MacNevin
> Cc: Tim Durack; Chris Nicholls; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6?
> 
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Christian MacNevin wrote:
> 
>> Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map?
> 
> Last I checked (couple of months ago) there wasn't even a standard for it, 
> I expressed my opinion in the IETF WG IPv6 control plane for MPLS needs 
> feature parity with IPv4, and LDPv6 is definitely one of the things needed 
> first.
> 


-- 


David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Group