Sorry to take so long for the the update. I can't believe the interfaces were shutdown... but over the weekend I retried it and had success in getting the setup exactly how we wanted, which was dot1q over the T1.
HQ-Switch#show run
vlan 1998
!
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1998
switchport mode trunk
!
interface Vlan1998
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
!
!
end
-------------------
HQ-Router#show run
ip cef
!
!
l2tp-class l2class
!
pseudowire-class pswire
encapsulation l2tpv3
protocol l2tpv3 l2class
ip local interface Loopback0
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1998
encapsulation dot1Q 1998
no cdp enable
xconnect 172.16.2.2 100 pw-class pswire
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0/0
ip address 192.168.93.197 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
no cdp enable
!
ip route 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.255 192.168.93.198
!
end
-------------------
Client Router#show run
!
ip cef
!
!
!
!
l2tp-class l2class
!
!
pseudowire-class pswire
encapsulation l2tpv3
protocol l2tpv3 l2class
ip local interface Loopback0
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1998
encapsulation dot1Q 1998
no cdp enable
xconnect 172.16.1.1 100 pw-class pswire
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0/0
ip address 192.168.93.198 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
no cdp enable
!
ip route 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.93.197
!
end
--------------------
Client-Switch#show run
!
vlan 1998
!
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1998
switchport mode trunk
!
!
interface Vlan1998
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252
!
!
end
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent C Jones" <v.jones at networkingunlimited.com>
To: "Anthony V. Daroqui" <adaroqui at coherecomm.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:05:01 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco L2tpv3
According to your "show run" all interfaces on the router are in
shutdown state, so nothing is going to work. One you have interfaces up,
you also need to have working routes at each end to the IP address of
the pseudowire endpoint at the other end.
--
Vincent C. Jones
Networking Unlimited, Inc.
Phone: +1 201 568-7810
V.Jones at NetworkingUnlimited.com
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:54 -0700, Anthony V. Daroqui wrote:
> Hi, I am currently trying to provide one of our clients a vlan over a PPP link as per their request of only a layer 2 connection.
> The connection would be like 3750g <--> 7200 <--> 1841 where the 7200 and 1841 is a ppp link. In doing some research, we found L2TPv3 to be a viable option. However, I am having trouble keeping the tunnel up and sending traffic over it.
>
> At the moment I am trying to configure only a simple layer 2 tunnel on test devices: 2 1841 routers, Version 12.4(15)T12, Advanced Services.
>
> I am currently using these 2 sites as reference: http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com/2010/05/11/l2tpv3-over-hdlc-l2tpv3-over-ppp/, http://www.informit.com/library/content.aspx?b=Troubleshooting_VPNs&seqNum=44
>
> On the other hand I was also recently informed that there may be too much overhead in a layer 2 tunnel. If that is the case, what is the more viable option for this setup?
>
> I have attached the debug output from the tunnels as well. Any assistance would be appreciated.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/