[c-nsp] Real life performance of NPE G1/G2?
Vladislav Vasilev
vvasilev at vvasilev.net
Thu Jun 3 11:53:06 EDT 2010
7201
border#show interfaces | include 30 second
30 second input rate 303701000 bits/sec, 65423 packets/sec
30 second output rate 415334000 bits/sec, 91183 packets/sec
30 second input rate 344349000 bits/sec, 71995 packets/sec
30 second output rate 238380000 bits/sec, 51661 packets/sec
30 second input rate 501918000 bits/sec, 77523 packets/sec
30 second output rate 92752000 bits/sec, 31161 packets/sec
30 second input rate 165472000 bits/sec, 48661 packets/sec
30 second output rate 567567000 bits/sec, 89560 packets/sec
CPU utilization for five seconds: 81%/80%; one minute: 83%; five minutes: 84%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
88 162179888 152815159 1061 0.63% 0.61% 0.60% 0 IP Input
137 6512208 1380234707 4 0.23% 0.17% 0.21% 0 HQF
Shaper Backg
138 5323396 1380243783 3 0.23% 0.22% 0.17% 0 HQF
Input Shaper
236 2080 966 2153 0.07% 0.14% 0.09% 6 SSH Process
87 1741016 176300421 9 0.07% 0.03% 0.02% 0 IP
ARP Retry Age
219 4868820 6262998 777 0.07% 0.05% 0.06% 0 Per-Second Jobs
52 175064 6104656 28 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 TTY Background
49 3958532 1485559 2664 0.07% 0.02% 0.00% 0 Net Background
129 1926044 40172190 47 0.07% 0.04% 0.03% 0 TCP Timer
30 25137836 16986545 1479 0.07% 0.07% 0.07% 0 ARP Input
237 24649044 13797430 1786 0.07% 0.04% 0.04% 0 BGP Router
I've seen it going up to 90%. We are waiting for a nex box that is
going to replace it.
BGP only, pure routing!
Regards,
V.Vasilev
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Bill Blackford wrote:
>
> NPE-G1:
> 30 second input rate 291676000 bits/sec, 43663 packets/sec
> 30 second output rate 188345000 bits/sec, 40398 packets/sec
> 30 second input rate 198417000 bits/sec, 41787 packets/sec
> 30 second output rate 294039000 bits/sec, 45029 packets/sec
> 30 second input rate 1564000 bits/sec, 855 packets/sec
> 30 second output rate 7768000 bits/sec, 985 packets/sec
> 30 second input rate 1470000 bits/sec, 634 packets/sec
> 30 second output rate 3325000 bits/sec, 530 packets/sec
>
> CPU utilization for five seconds: 31%/29%; one minute: 31%; five minutes:
> 31%
> PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> 41 548194428 59902908 9151 0.81% 0.76% 0.74% 0 Per-Second
> Jobs
> 5 44515044 6141023 7248 0.24% 0.06% 0.06% 0 Check heaps
> 191 208 23894 8 0.16% 0.10% 0.03% 2 Virtual Exec
> 67 125600100 772213214 162 0.16% 0.16% 0.16% 0 IP Input
> 139 1029072 30023654 34 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0 OSPF-xxx
> Hello
> 193 4652841869193835 0 0.08% 0.08% 0.08% 0 PPP manager
> 37 54071088 27154314 1991 0.08% 0.08% 0.08% 0 Net Background
>
> No BGP, Yes OSPF, Yes ACLs, Yes CEF, Yes PIM,
>
> Let me know what else you want.
>
> -Hank
>
>
>> My experience was a bit different. I could have probably pushed 500Mbps
>> with large packets, but my traffic is composed of a lot of small packets and
>> micro-bursts. So in my case, I don't quantify it's performance in terms of
>> bandwidth, but rather in terms of the volume of packets. I would see it die
>> at or above 50k PPS forwarding through two interfaces. I now use line-rate
>> devices (ASR1002's) in this role and the 7200/7300 series are on the test
>> rack.
>>
>> -b
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 6:18 AM
>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Real life performance of NPE G1/G2?
>>
>> On Tuesday 01 June 2010 08:53:30 pm Garry wrote:
>>
>>> I was wondering, what real life performance can one expect from an
>>> NPE G1, considering mostly vanilla IP routing/forwarding? (no ACLs,
>>> no VPNs, running CEF and MPLS VRFs, OSPF/iBGP for routing protocol,
>>> and utilizing the integrated Gbit interfaces as well as 1-2 STM1 PAs
>>> on the 7200 VXR chassis)
>>
>> I've seen an NPE-G1 configured with just IP addresses and 2 BGP peers (2
>> prefixes in each, none out), no ACL's, no VPN's, no QoS - basically, real
>> vanilla.
>>
>> It was forwarding ~920Mbps in total (I know, weird, huh) broken down as 3x
>> interfaces each doing a little over 300Mbps.
>>
>> As a real serving edge node, I haven't been able to get more than 500Mbps
>> total out of it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list