[c-nsp] Faster iBGP convergance: Tune the timers or use FastPeering Session Deactivation?

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboehmer at cisco.com
Tue Jun 8 14:33:36 EDT 2010


 
> There seems to be two viable options:
> 
> 1) Reduce the iBGP timers to 1/3
> 2) Use fall-over (fast peering session deactivation), with a route-map
to
> only match /32s so the presence of aggregates or defaults doesn't have
an
> affect [1]
>...
> [1] Nexthop Tracking has the same limitation, the route never becomes
> invalid in the presence of a shorter-match.

3) don't use 1) or 2), and use NHT tracking with a route-map to only
match /32 ("Selective Address Tracking")

3) is IMHO the best option. I would never tear down an iBGP session to
signal failure..

	oli

  



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list