[c-nsp] route-map IN / OUT deny issue

[Tony Varriale]

I prefer my configs to be deterministic in what I am trying to accomplish.

If you would have had a match statement and achieved had the same outcome, 
would you be: less, more or have the same amount of confuzzlement?

To each their own.

tv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy B." <globichen at gmail.com>
To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale at comcast.net>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] route-map IN / OUT deny issue


On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Tony Varriale <tvarriale at comcast.net> wrote:
> Looks right to me. No match statement = bad.
>

Why is that bad? Most docs I went through say something like this:

"If no match statement is configured under a route map statement, the
default action is to
match everything." Doesn't look bad to me.

By the way, statement # 10 is the first in my route-map.

Andy