[c-nsp] Currently recommended Stable IOS for 760x?

[Dan Holme]

I have had good experiences with SRD. SRC is pretty stable too but has
a collection of BGP related memory leaks you need to watch out for.

I have only had bad experiences with SRE, so much so that we had to
roll-back a SUP720 from SRE back onto SRC because of crashes (related
to CSCte95042,CSCte98086).

--Dan

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Walter Keen
<walter.keen at rainierconnect.net> wrote:
> SRD2a and SRD3 on the sup720-3b has a bug where you can't check ospf neighbor relationships via snmp, if that's a consideration.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson
> Sent: Wed 3/3/2010 10:53 PM
> To: Lasher, Donn
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Currently recommended Stable IOS for 760x?
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Lasher, Donn wrote:
>
>> What's the currently recommended stable IOS for the 7600 (sup720-3bxl)
>> with Service Provider (IP/MPLS/QoS/etc) intent? I see a reply from
>> Rodney back in April'09 recommended SRB, but I'm curious what it is
>> today..
>
> SRD4 looks very promising, don't know if anyone has experience with it?
>
> SRB5 has a bug with default-route over BGP and intermittent arp related
> problems, so I wouldn't recommend it.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>