[c-nsp] N7K tcam handling

[Tim Durack]

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Tim Stevenson <tstevens at cisco.com> wrote:
> As you probably know, n7k today has a 128K FIB TCAM, inadequate to hold full
> routes anyway. Near-term we will have an XL card that holds 900K prefixes.
> In that case, you should not run out of FIB TCAM in the case you describe,
> but as always, you should be sure not to "miss" configuring route limits &
> filters to avoid issues, that's clearly best practice.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Tim

Yes, thanks.

-- 
Tim:>