[c-nsp] inet vrf

[Dirk-Jan van Helmond]

Do you have a partial table in the global routing table AND a partial table inside the VRF?

Then yes.


On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Tim Durack wrote:

> Having a hard time figuring this out. I have a vrf with around 30k
> prefixes (partial Internet.)
> 
> Sup720-3BXL shows:
> 
> RTR-2#sh mls cef summary detail
> 
> Total routes:                                    58231
>    IPv4 unicast routes:                         29043
>        IPv4 non-vrf routes:                     89
>        IPv4 non-vrf routes (internal):          0
>        IPv4 vrf routes:                         28943
>        IPv4 vrf routes (internal):              11
>    IPv4 Multicast routes:                       5
>    MPLS routes:                                 28849
>    IPv6 unicast routes:                         330
>        IPv6 non-vrf routes:                     6
>        IPv6 non-vrf routes (internal):          0
>        IPv6 vrf routes:                         69
>        IPv6 vrf routes (internal):              255
>    IPv6 multicast routes:                       3
>    EoM routes:                                  1
> 
> What are "IPv4 vrf routes" as opposed to "MPLS routes"?
> 
> Looks like the prefixes count twice from a fib perspective. Is that correct?
> 
> -- 
> Tim:>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/