[c-nsp] inet vrf
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Mar 11 05:52:04 EST 2010
On 03/10/2010 08:30 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> Having a hard time figuring this out. I have a vrf with around 30k
> prefixes (partial Internet.)
>
> Sup720-3BXL shows:
>
> RTR-2#sh mls cef summary detail
>
> Total routes: 58231
> IPv4 unicast routes: 29043
> IPv4 non-vrf routes: 89
> IPv4 non-vrf routes (internal): 0
> IPv4 vrf routes: 28943
> IPv4 vrf routes (internal): 11
> IPv4 Multicast routes: 5
> MPLS routes: 28849
> IPv6 unicast routes: 330
> IPv6 non-vrf routes: 6
> IPv6 non-vrf routes (internal): 0
> IPv6 vrf routes: 69
> IPv6 vrf routes (internal): 255
> IPv6 multicast routes: 3
> EoM routes: 1
>
> What are "IPv4 vrf routes" as opposed to "MPLS routes"?
The box will generate and advertise a distinct MPLS LSP for each route
which has a next-hop, plus one overall label for the VRF aggregate, for
"connected" routes.
That is, these 4 routes:
192.168.1.0/24 -> 192.168.100.100
192.168.2.0/24 -> 192.168.100.100
192.168.3.0/24 -> connected
192.168.4.0/24 -> connected
...will generate 3 MPLS labels:
192.168.1.0/24 -> label=98
192.168.2.0/24 -> label=99
192.168.3.0/24 -> VRF agg. label=100
192.168.4.0/24 -> VRF agg. label=100
So you'll burn a lot of MPLS labels
>
> Looks like the prefixes count twice from a fib perspective. Is that correct?
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list