[c-nsp] Spanning-Tree vs. EoMPLS links in SXI2?
Daniska, Tomas
tomas at soitron.com
Mon Mar 15 18:20:50 EDT 2010
Gert,
> -----Original Message-----
>
> > Having said that, there are some subtle differences how L2 PDUs
> (read:
> > LACP, STP, VTP, CDP, 802.1x, etc.) are handled by the 3B/3BXL and
> > 3C/3CXL.
>
> ... and that's what I assumed, since both "your" bug ID and the other
> one specifically mention 3C.
>
> (Which is actually quite interesting - so far, the most prominent
> difference between 3B and 3C has been the size of the CAM tables, but
> there must be more things under the hood...)
also the case with MSNLB packets being dropped under some circumstances
I asked a few weeks ago is related to 3C, 3B being OK. Here, it's
actually reported as a feature, not a bug... a result of Cisco making 3C
more RFC-compliant (1812 in this case) than 3B is. So definitely there
are differences in packet (and/or header) handling between 3B and 3C.
Don't see the very details, but this is what I was told and/or
understood.
--
deejay
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list