[c-nsp] inet vrf

[Manu Chao]

AFAIK, FIB and LFIB are just not the same table and the MSFC distributes the
routing information in both tables to the PFC3B(XL).

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Having a hard time figuring this out. I have a vrf with around 30k
> prefixes (partial Internet.)
>
> Sup720-3BXL shows:
>
> RTR-2#sh mls cef summary detail
>
> Total routes:                                    58231
>    IPv4 unicast routes:                         29043
>        IPv4 non-vrf routes:                     89
>        IPv4 non-vrf routes (internal):          0
>        IPv4 vrf routes:                         28943
>        IPv4 vrf routes (internal):              11
>    IPv4 Multicast routes:                       5
>    MPLS routes:                                 28849
>    IPv6 unicast routes:                         330
>        IPv6 non-vrf routes:                     6
>        IPv6 non-vrf routes (internal):          0
>        IPv6 vrf routes:                         69
>        IPv6 vrf routes (internal):              255
>    IPv6 multicast routes:                       3
>    EoM routes:                                  1
>
> What are "IPv4 vrf routes" as opposed to "MPLS routes"?
>
> Looks like the prefixes count twice from a fib perspective. Is that
> correct?
>
> --
> Tim:>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>