[c-nsp] IPv6

Devon True devon at noved.org
Tue Mar 16 09:31:13 EDT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/16/2010 9:19 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I believe most people feel that a /126 should be used the same place you would use /30

FWIW, the recent NANOG meeting discussed numbering your IPv6 links.

http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/abstracts.php?pt=MTU1NCZuYW5vZzQ4&nm=nanog48

Best advice I thought was regardless of what scheme you decide to use
(/126, /112, etc), reserve the entire /64 so that you don't shoot
yourself in the foot in case some new "must have" feature appears and
requires a /64 on ptp links.

- --
Devon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkufiCEACgkQWP2WrBTHBS8YTACfZuEY2PjPGTmlbAK0i3HoVQDk
IiEAnAqj8jSpTNQ9u3KEgHOZ1TQ1ZpE1
=lx+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list