[c-nsp] IPv6

[Drew Weaver]

Hi,

I'm not sure I would want that many port scans, etc being bounced off of my 'connected' router interfaces whether the rest of the IPs are 'routed' or not.

YMMV.

-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jens Link
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:33 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6

Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I believe most people feel that a /126 should be used the same place you
> would use /30

Many people feel that a /64 should be used as smallest network size for
IPv6 even on point-to-point links. 

Jens
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40  | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264         |
| http://www.quux.de | http://blog.quux.de   | jabber: jenslink at guug.de |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/