[c-nsp] STP in L2TPv3

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Chris Flav wrote:
> >I saw this across a few router platforms; so I'm guessing in may me embedded in the base IOS code:
> >* 7200
> >* 1800
> >* 2600
> 
> How incredibly annoying.  Is there any L2 tunneling means that will allow for STP packets tunneled over a L3 network?

Well, *working* L2TPV3 and *working* EoMPLS will certainly do so...

This is just buggered software.

L2 tunnels should be fully transparent (or configurable which packet 
types to forward and which not).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100316/e4d8cdf1/attachment.bin>