[c-nsp] 6500s SXI and EoMPLS

[Pavel Skovajsa]

Correct,

the WS-X67xx are LAN based cards, and are not "supposed" to be used in
SP environment. There are cards especially targeted for that -
especially ES40/ES20+ with their EVC stuff. Of course they only work
on C7600, and of course they are expensive as hell.

For more info see [1]

-pavel skovajsa

[1] http://markmail.org/message/otbacj6qrpmxzndj#query:cisco%20ES40+page:1+mid:gdg6e4vca27whplb+state:results

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Michael Robson
<Michael.Robson at manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:56, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> For QOS:
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
>> figuration/guide/mplsqos.html
>>
>> For TE (and MPLS in general) check:
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
>> figuration/guide/pfc3mpls.html
>>
>
> These documents mention no reference to TE for EoMPLS: is it safe to assume
> therefore that the 650 doesn't support tE for EoMPLS?
>
> Am I also correct in saying that, since outgoing policies are not support on
> 6500s for LAN-based cards, there is no real way to give shape or restrict
> EoMPLS pseudowire bandwidths by EXP/TC field?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Michael.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>