On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder at wisc.edu> wrote: > Or is it just wanting the semantic ease of applying a filter to lo0 > on vendor J kit? Amen. Which is what CoPP is supposed to be. Except for the caveats related to CoPP on an EARL7 based box. Which aren't well documented, and hurt when discovered. -- Tim:>