[c-nsp] Spanning-Tree vs. EoMPLS links in SXI2?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:26:12AM +1000, David Hughes wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for the update.
> 
> On 23/03/2010, at 8:47 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> > The problem could be reproduced with our combination of ingress/egress
> > modules in the TAC lab, and a bug ID has been assigned: CSCtf77954=
> 
> So TAC confirmed it's specific to the linecards in use as well as the 
> IOS version?  I don't want to trip over this problem.

TAC said it's specific to the *egress* line card (6708 with DFC-3CXL),
and they suggested, as a workaround, to use the 10G ports on the Supervisor 
engine instead (Sup720-10G-3CXL).  We didn't test this (used a workaround
via a different router).

They also said that the bug will be fixed in SXI4, to be released in July.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100326/9c0ef583/attachment.bin>