[c-nsp] quick spanning tree question
Yuri Bank
yuribank at gmail.com
Sat Mar 27 03:13:53 EDT 2010
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Cord MacLeod <cordmacleod at gmail.com>wrote:
> 3 days ago traffic started showing up on the trunk port connecting my top
> of rack switches. Each of these switches has it's own better trunk path to
> the root bridge. I can't see why any traffic at all would traverse these
> links unless the other trunk on g0/45 was down, which it isn't. Also,
> spanning tree doesn't claim any topology changes.
>
> switch3#sh spanning-tree root port
> VLAN0001 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0100 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0101 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0102 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0120 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0200 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0231 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0250 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0321 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0450 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0777 GigabitEthernet0/45
> VLAN0888 GigabitEthernet0/45
> switch3#
>
> All vlans read same the Root and Desg port.
>
> VLAN0101
> Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
> Root ID Priority 24677
> Address 0017.e1d6.e111
> Cost 4
> Port 45 (GigabitEthernet0/45)
> Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
>
> Bridge ID Priority 32869 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 101)
> Address 001e.1494.4000
> Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
> Aging Time 300
>
> Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
> ---------------- ---- --- --------- --------
> --------------------------------
> Gi0/45 Root FWD 4 128.45 P2p
> Gi0/46 Desg FWD 4 128.46 P2p
>
> Any ideas?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
Have you checked the type of traffic traversing the trunk between the top of
rack switches? Perhaps that could give you a clue as to why this is
happening. ( Maybe some kind of broadcast traffic?).
-Yuri
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list