[c-nsp] two 72xx, bridging via POS link?

[Rodney Dunn]

Ack....EoMPLS/L2TPV3 type deployments scale much better than 
bridge-groups (aka: legacy bridging).

Rodney



On 3/27/10 10:50 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, neal rauhauser wrote:
>
>> Yes, I have to bridge. I've looked at it every which way, we're replacing
>
> It'd probably make more sense to use xconnect over either IP or MPLS in
> your case, than trying to bridge the traffic. This will do the same
> thing but will avoid having to use bridge-groups.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/