[c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

[Michael K. Smith]

There's really not enough to go on.  You haven't said what type of
interfaces are involved or shown the configuration of those interfaces on
two sides of a link.  Are they Ethernet, SONET, Frame-Relay?

My guess is that you don't have your ospf network type correct on your
interfaces, but without seeing interface configs *and* your ospf router
config, it's impossible to tell.

Mike


On 5/11/10 10:57 PM, "shake righa" <ssrigha at gmail.com> wrote:

> output     show ip ospf
> 
> Supports only single TOS(TOS0) routes
>  Supports opaque LSA
>  Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS)
>  Initial SPF schedule delay 5000 msecs
>  Minimum hold time between two consecutive SPFs 10000 msecs
>  Maximum wait time between two consecutive SPFs 10000 msecs
>  Minimum LSA interval 5 secs. Minimum LSA arrival 1 secs
>  LSA group pacing timer 240 secs
>  Interface flood pacing timer 33 msecs
>  Retransmission pacing timer 66 msecs
>  Number of external LSA 0. Checksum Sum 0x000000
>  Number of opaque AS LSA 0. Checksum Sum 0x000000
>  Number of DCbitless external and opaque AS LSA 0
>  Number of DoNotAge external and opaque AS LSA 0
>  Number of areas in this router is 1. 1 normal 0 stub 0 nssa
>  External flood list length 0
>     Area BACKBONE(0) (Inactive)
>         Number of interfaces in this area is 8 (1 loopback)
>         Area has message digest authentication
>         SPF algorithm last executed 08:13:04.952 ago
>         SPF algorithm executed 1 times
>         Area ranges are
>         Number of LSA 1. Checksum Sum 0x0064D2
>         Number of opaque link LSA 0. Checksum Sum 0x000000
>         Number of DCbitless LSA 0
>         Number of indication LSA 0
>         Number of DoNotAge LSA 0
>         Flood list length 0
> 
> 
> Rgrds,
> Shake
> 
> On 5/12/10, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:
>> Hi Shake,
>> 
>> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 00:46 +0300, shake righa wrote:
>>> Sascha,
>>> 
>>> Output
>>> show ip ospf
>> [...]
>> 
>> You forgot this:
>> 
>>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Sascha E. Pollok
>>> <nsp-list at pollok.net>wrote:
>>>> "sh ip ospf interface .." and/or configuration snippets.
>> 
>> = a "show ip ospf interface" might explain the reason.
>> 
>> --
>> Peter
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/