[c-nsp] Server Load Balancer - Cisco vs Brocade vs F5

Drew Weaver drew.weaver at thenap.com
Tue May 18 19:46:50 EDT 2010


We've been using Brocade (Foundry before) for close to 10 years (ServerIron XL and ADX) and it works great, not much learning curve either.

-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Felix Nkansah
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:43 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Server Load Balancer - Cisco vs Brocade vs F5

Hi All,

I deployed a number of Cisco CSS load balancers for a client, about 2 years
ago.

However, they tell me today that they are unhappy with the product and are
considering non-Cisco alternatives for their new projects.

Interestingly, all they say is that they have "issues" with Cisco CSS; I
don't know what those problems are.

They are considering either of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager or Brocade
ServerIron ADX platforms for their new server load-balancing needs.

I was wondering if any of you have praises for the F5 and/or Brocade
load-balancing offerings?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list