[c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

Skeeve Stevens Skeeve at eintellego.net
Mon May 24 09:03:51 EDT 2010


I don't think this email got through the other day... I didn't see it appear.

...Skeeve


From: Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2010 10:27 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

Hey all,

I am doing some iSCSI implementations are the moment and are looking at which switch models are best for different iSCSI rollouts we're doing.

I am wanting to know which 29xx and 35xx/37xx series switches have the following:


-          Size of packet buffering per model

-          If the PB is per port or shared

-          Is there one or more classes of PB classification

-          If the PB is shared, is it per switching module (i.e. 8/12 port block) or across the entire switch

-          If the 10GB model is plugged in, does it have its own PB, or does it share the main boards?

I looked in the Portable Product Sheet - http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html  but found nothing, and Google and Cisco.com proved useless.  Maybe there is a reason for this, or my searchfoo is weak.

...Skeeve


--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
Disclaimer: Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or legally privileged information. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. eintellego Pty Ltd and each legal entity in the Tefilah Pty Ltd group of companies reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity. Any reference to costs, fee quotations, contractual transactions and variations to contract terms is subject to separate confirmation in writing signed by an authorised representative of eintellego. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard inbound and outbound e-mails, we cannot guarantee that attachments are virus-free or compatible with your systems and do not accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list