[c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

tkapela at gmail.com tkapela at gmail.com
Mon May 24 11:03:32 EDT 2010


Imho, one should not encourage this nonsense by signing any such NDA. Brocade, juniper, extreme, and others publish such data about their products right on their darn respective websites, and without demonstrable harm.

Knowing if something has a shared+per-port limit vs per-port-asic vs per-port mac/asic buffering arch is inconsequential, and represents no competitive disadvantage--unless the (advantage?) purpose is, in fact, to obscure details.

As for getting this data from the hardware itself, poke around MQC and MLS qos show commands, and attempt to configure mls/mqc QoS policies. These features usually will indicate what their "maxiums" are on the platforms in question, while you're configuring them.

-Tk

-----Original Message-----
From: "Arie Vayner (avayner)" <avayner at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:47:38 
To: Skeeve Stevens<Skeeve at eintellego.net>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

Skeeve,

If you want to get this info in the "right" way, then the best approach
would be to talk to your local Cisco account team...
Some of the info may require NDA etc.

On the same point, you may want to also look at 4948E and Nexus5000
switches, which could give you better latency performance, which is
important for storage-related applications.

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 16:04
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

I don't think this email got through the other day... I didn't see it
appear.

...Skeeve


From: Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2010 10:27 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

Hey all,

I am doing some iSCSI implementations are the moment and are looking at
which switch models are best for different iSCSI rollouts we're doing.

I am wanting to know which 29xx and 35xx/37xx series switches have the
following:


-          Size of packet buffering per model

-          If the PB is per port or shared

-          Is there one or more classes of PB classification

-          If the PB is shared, is it per switching module (i.e. 8/12
port block) or across the entire switch

-          If the 10GB model is plugged in, does it have its own PB, or
does it share the main boards?

I looked in the Portable Product Sheet -
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html  but
found nothing, and Google and Cisco.com proved useless.  Maybe there is
a reason for this, or my searchfoo is weak.

...Skeeve


--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
Disclaimer: Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the
named person's use only. It may contain sensitive and private
proprietary or legally privileged information. You must not, directly or
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message if you are not the intended recipient. eintellego Pty Ltd and
each legal entity in the Tefilah Pty Ltd group of companies reserve the
right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised
to state them to be the views of any such entity. Any reference to
costs, fee quotations, contractual transactions and variations to
contract terms is subject to separate confirmation in writing signed by
an authorised representative of eintellego. Whilst all efforts are made
to safeguard inbound and outbound e-mails, we cannot guarantee that
attachments are!
  virus-free or compatible with your systems and do not accept any
liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list