[c-nsp] sup2t -- where the deets' at?

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday 30 May 2010 01:22:33 am Nick Hilliard wrote:

> The sup-2t is horrendously late, and really ought to have
>  been delivered several years ago.  Its late delivery has
>  left the 65k/76k product line in a position where they
>  have been eclipsed by the competition in terms of both
>  raw throughput and 10G chassis density.  The 65k/76k
>  series does lots of things really well, just not 10G.

Oh, but don't forget - if you want a current switching 
platform that can handle the density and bandwidth, you'll 
be pointed to the Nexus 7000.

And before you start yelling that the 6500 does more IP and 
MPLS than most folk will do on a Nexus 7000 series today, 
you'll be pointed to yet another platform, the ASR9000.

Don't you just love it :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100530/49e1801e/attachment.bin>