[c-nsp] Best practices for Cat6500

[Robert Hass]

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:

> That seems like a bit of a dangerous "feature" to introduce with no warning,
> if that's what's really happening; what if you have a complex multi-edit
> sequence to go through when rebuilding a route-map?
>
> I'm not seeing the behaviour - a quick test on an eBGP peer locally doesn't
> do this on our SXI4a box. Can you show some BGP config?

I just found that SXI5 has been released two days ago.
According to SXI5 release-notes this behavior has been fixed in this
release (CSCtf64231).