[c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:23:26 am Pete Lumbis wrote:

> Only a guess, but I'd probably say they didn't test new
> code with old rommon so they can't guarantee something
> won't go wrong. I've seen plenty of times where it will
> work perfectly fine forever, but if they never tested it
> they don't want to make people believe it will work as
> advertised.

You mean like a lot of current code on the NPE-300, for 
example :-)?

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20101115/041086b1/attachment.bin>