[c-nsp] Blackhole Inbound Traffic

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:21:05 am Pete Templin 
wrote:

> Likewise, your blackhole routes need to
> be longer than existing routing entries, or the
> more-specific routes will take precedence, regardless of
> local-pref.

Which is why we limit customers to /32 (v4) and /128 (v6) 
when sending routes to us for blackholing. It's more 
resource-intensive, but ensures customers know what they're 
doing. Better that than allowing customers to blackhole 
whole ranges of space :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20101119/e5cc2254/attachment.bin>