[c-nsp] Assurared BW to customer

[jack daniels]

MAP GE to 4 STM1  --

STM1 form (PROVIDER A)
STM1 form (PROVIDER A)
STM1 form (PROVIDER B)
STM1 form (PROVIDER B)

This is done for redundancy ...In case  Providers ( A ) go down then
we have only 155*2 BW left.(CONGESTION)


On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Keegan Holley
<keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> An STM is simply a group of time slots over the existing physical path.  It
> would be pretty strange for an STM to go down without the entire circuit
> going down.  Less strange would be misconfiguration, but that has all the
> standard hooks.  If you own the layer-1 equipment then change control
> policies would help with this.  I'm personally not aware of a way to monitor
> capacity from within the circuit without testing and trying to use all the
> available bandwidth, which would defeat the purpose.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:56 AM, jack daniels <jckdaniels12 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have a EOSDH as a primary link in which GE is mapped to 4 STM-1
>>
>> and backup path is another GE Link.
>>
>> In case 2 STM-1 out of 4 STM-1 in EOSDH fail my routing will not be
>> aware of that and will not reroute the traffic to backup GE.
>> This will lead to congestion on Primary link , while backup path not
>> at all be used.
>>  Is there any way to work out this issue.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>
>