[c-nsp] PA-FE-TX, PA-FE-TX/ISL, PA-2FE-TX, PA-2FE-TX/ISL

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 02:24:19 pm 
sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:

> Still not great if you want to handle a line rate DDoS
> attack with minimum size packets...

Agree - but if the budget is tight, some pain might not be 
avoidable.

My take is if you want to handle 1Gbps (or better) on a 
sustained basis (as opposed to a couple of hundred-Mbps at 
peak), you really should be looking beyond the 7200.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20100901/6d061263/attachment.bin>