[c-nsp] Cisco Routers: Performance benchmark
arulgobinath emmanuel
arulgobi at gmail.com
Wed Sep 8 00:11:03 EDT 2010
Dear All,
Anybody have tested these values (
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf)
, since 64bytes on 1841 doesn't give the provided results (30Mbps).
Regards,
Gobinath.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Christopher J. Wargaski <wargo1 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks, Elmar. That *was* too easy and way too intuitive. (I did not
> expect that from Cisco. ;-)
>
>
> Humbly,
> cjw
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:39:44 +0200
> > From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi at 4ever.de>
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Routers: Performance benchmark
> > Message-ID: <20100902083944.GV35940 at ronin.4ever.de>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > wargo1 at gmail.com (Christopher J. Wargaski) wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for posting the URL for the router performance matrix. Anyone
> >> know of a similar matrix for switches (L2 & L3) and firewalls?
> >
> > Have you tried s/router/switch/ in the URL?
> >
> > Life can be so easy.
> >
> >
> >> > Not all as requested, but a start:
> >> >
> >> >
> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list