[c-nsp] Multiple NAT & Rerouting Web Traffic
Ray Davis
ray-lists at carpe.net
Thu Sep 9 10:43:06 EDT 2010
Hi Jan,
Not. I already tried "set interface Dialer3" instead of the next-hop. :/
Thanks,
Ray
On 8. Sep 2010, at 14:47 Uhr, Jan Gregor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> glad that first part worked. I would suggest change the PBR route-map to
> "set interface Dialer3". Maybe that helps, maybe not :).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jan
>
> On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Davis wrote:
>> Thanks for the help!
>>
>> I tried my previous test config again except with this difference...
>>
>> ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
>> deny tcp any any eq www
>> deny tcp any any eq 443
>> deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
>> deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255
>> permit ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 any
>>
>> If I do a "sh ip nat translations" it looks like http traffic is being NATed correctly:
>>
>> HTTP Traffic (123.123.123.123 is the VDSL ip address):
>> tcp 123.123.123.123:14757 192.168.8.1:14757 212.96.133.192:80 212.96.133.192:80
>>
>> Non-HTTP Traffic (12.34.12.34 is the SDSL ip address (default)):
>> tcp 12.34.12.34:50004 192.168.8.115:50004 93.133.195.154:5938 93.133.195.154:5938
>>
>> But doesn't seem to go out the correct interface. At least there is never an http connection made. :/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ray
>>
>> On 6. Sep 2010, at 22:35 Uhr, Jan Gregor wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> access-list 110 remark ***** ACL route-map RerouteWebTraffic *****
>>>> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq www
>>>> access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 443
>>>>
>>>> route-map sdsl permit 10
>>>> match ip address NAT_Exempt
>>>>
>>>> ip access-list extended NAT_Exempt
>>>> deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
>>>> deny ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255
>>>> permit ip 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255 any
>>>
>>> I guess this is the problem. Try denying things allowed in acl 110 away
>>> from acl NAT_Exempt and see if that helps (be sure that these new denies
>>> are before permit in that acl).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list